IUniverse, 105 pages, $12.95
Carl Rollyson reads biographies. He writes biographies. He writes about reading biographies. He writes about writing biographies. Writers are the subject of many of the biographies he reads and writes. Whew! Add up this reading and writing and you arrive at a sum of literary arithmetic called On Biography, Rollysons regular column for The New York Sun. Part book review, part essay, always timely and interesting, On Biography covers biographys subjects and the subject of biography in a two-for-one deal. Reading Biography is Rollysons first collection of these essays, which he began writing in Spring 2003.
Emerson wrote that There is properly no history; only biography. Disraeli: Read no history; nothing but biography, for that is life without theory. Carlyle: History is the essence of innumerable biographies. Rollyson knew he was onto something when he took up the subject of biography. But why biography now? Historians distrust biography, Rollyson writes in a review of two books on Stalin. Modern historiography has rejected Thomas Carlyles Great Man theory of history in favor of complex explorations of historical process, of the forces and factors that shape the world regardless of its individual players. True enough, but social history doesnt exactly lend itself to page-turner reading, and increasingly it is biographers who have taken up the slack of writing accessible history. Rollyson settles on a quote from Louis Fischer to best describe his interest: Biography is history seen through the prism of a person.
As a biographer himself, Rollyson has more than a few ideas about its mechanics. He writes of Michael Barbers Anthony Powell: A Life, for example:
I like the feel of Mr. Barbers book, and the sense that he is aware of how to manage his own narrative. Thus he writes: This is probably the place to summarise Powells athletic record at Eton. Rarely does he succumb to the bane of biography, the must have been and the reasonable to suppose, which are no more than oblique confessions of ignorance.With more than a concern for tricks of the trade, Rollyson clues us into becomingif not better writersbetter readers of biography. Reading Biography has a production value that can best be described as cut-and-paste. The upside is that it contains reviews that are still quite timelycovering many of the same books reviewed recently in these pages.
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 23 Number 7, on page 75
Copyright © 2021 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com