A month ago in these pages I fretted over how contemporary audiences and artists might respond to the fervent seriousness embodied in Clyfford Still’s paintings. Animated by irony, allusiveness, and free-floating cosmopolitanism, our governing sensibility was, I suggested, devoid of the solemnity of purpose that carried cultural weight in the decade and a half after World War II, when Still reached the height of his powers. All that has changed. What the mood and tastes of the country will be in the coming years is anybody’s guess. What can be said is that art made before September 11, 2001, does not today look the same as it did before that date: amidst confusion, fear, and uncertainty, no overarching sensibility prevails. Whatever merits the cultural context imparted to recent works of art are now withheld, and, due to this, we might regard art from a certain distance, but we might also look with fresh eyes now that the slate has been so shockingly cleared.
Few photographers of the last ten years have been more influential than Philip-Lorca diCorcia, though, typical of the times, that influence was seen primarily in fashion spreads, advertising images, and editorial photographs—far less so than in fine art photography. Indeed, diCorcia has helped spread his particular style of image-making beyond purely artistic precincts: like many photographers going back to Steichen, he divides his time between commercial and gallery-oriented work, often cribbing from the latter to give brand-name appeal to his for-hire efforts. In earlier non-commercial