It was Baudelaire, I believe, who was the first to denounce the terms “avant-garde” and “revolutionary” as applied to the arts. They belonged to the world of politics and the military, and ought to stay there. It was only in the nineteenth century that they became current in the world of the arts, and in the twentieth that they became clichés. What they were attempting to describe had always been part of the process of history—and fashion: as long ago as Dante, the poet mentions the painter Cimabue as having recently been all the rage, but now “Giotto has the cry” (“ed ora ha Giotto il grido”). He speaks of this as no surprising thing, only a symptom of the endless revolution in human affairs and tastes. The history of art, and of painting in particular, is crammed with examples. Piero della Francesca, that monument of quattrocento classical purity, was old-fashioned as early as 1510 or so,...


A Message from the Editors

As a reader of our efforts, you have stood with us on the front lines in the battle for culture. Learn how your support contributes to our continued defense of truth.

Popular Right Now