Is it, or ought it to be, a legitimate plea in defense of rude or boorish or insulting behavior that it is what the rude or boorish or insulting person βreally thinksβ? Not many years since, I fancy, no one would seriously have maintained that it was. Even today, we are if anything overly sensitive about giving offense to the amour propre of people who are fat or unattractive or stupid or lacking in good taste or good manners. Yet somehow manners themselves have learned to look with indulgence upon the most appalling imputations, so long as they are or can claim to be sincerely believed, against the character, honor, or veracity of people who were once thought to be owed a certain degree of respect and even deferenceβthe President of the United States, say.
True, there were some protests when Congressmen David Bonior and Jim McDermott, speaking from Baghdad, said on βThis Weekβ with George Stephanopoulos that assurances of the good intentions of Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi leadership had to be taken βat their face valueβ while President Bush could only be expected to βmislead the American peopleβ in order to start a war. Michael Kelly called it βobsceneβ of them. George Will, on the spot, said that it was βthe most disgraceful performance by an American official abroad in my lifetime.β But Kelly and Will are both supporters of the Presidentβs policy on Iraq. Where were the denunciations from his opponents, from principled Democrats and