Weblog
About ArmaVirumque ( AHR-mah wih-ROOM-kweh) In the Aeneid, the Roman poet Virgil sang of "arms and a man" (Arma virumque cano). Month in and month out, The New Criterion expounds with great clarity and wit on the art, culture, and political controversies of our times. With postings of reviews, essays, links, recs, and news, Armavirumque seeks to continue this mission in accordance with the timetable of the digital age. Recent posts
Archives more archives
Info
Recent contributors
Shortcut
To contact The New Criterion by email, write to: letters@newcriterion.com.To contact The New Criterion by mail, write to: The New Criterion 900 Broadway Suite 602 New York, New York 10003 USA
Blogroll
Apr 12, 2007 09:52 AM by Stefan Beck
Surely I’m not alone in having spent much of middle and high school reading Kurt Vonnegut and then much of college sneering at anyone gullible enough to read him. If Vonnegut’s novels are anything, they’re easily outgrown, but what is easily outgrown is very often a perfect place to start. I owe a lot to those books, for one thing the ability to see their influence on some of today’s worst writing. Take this passage from Vonnegut’s famous Slaughterhouse-Five:
Now let’s have that again, in instant replay:
That spectacularly bad second bit isn’t from some late-career Vonnegut but rather from Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. Is it homage or theft? Does it even matter? The side-by-side sums up the sad fact about Vonnegut’s work: For all its seemingly biting satire, it was cocked at pretty safe targets and in the end was firing rubber bullets at them, anyway.
That’s the sad fact, but it isn’t the only fact. Another is that, for better or worse, Vonnegut knew and meant the simple things he wrote. He knew that war is hell because he’d witnessed it firsthand; he told his readers that war is hell because it’s worth repeating. He used humor (though it was sometimes merely cheek or non sequitur) because he grasped absurdity. He wrote a lot, over a dozen novels, because he enjoyed it—that much couldn’t possibly be clearer. His novels may not have been great literature, but they were the work of an original talent.
But how many young authors today seem to write not because they want to, not because they have much to say, but because they want to be seen as a Kurt Vonnegut, an elder statesman of zany profundity? Of course, left with wide-eyed naïfs like Foer and Friends, we’ll probably start to miss Vonnegut’s fatalism, if nothing else.
Mr. Vonnegut is dead at 84. Read his obituary here.
E-mail to friend
|
Subscriber login
Subscribe today
Print & Online packages Available
Already a print subscriber? click for online access New from The New Criterion: ‘Free speech in
Webcasts
Encounter Books at 10, an interview with Roger Simon
'The Face of Libel Tourism,' OPENING REMARKS AND PANEL ONE from Free Speech in an Age of Jihad:
'Suppressing Discussion of Islam,' PANEL TWO from Free Speech in an Age of Jihad: EventsOctober 22, 2008 GALA EVENT: The New Criterion Benefit Art Auction January 25, 2009 TRAVEL EVENT: The New Criterion Cruise More events > |





add a comment
you must be a new criterion subscriber to post a comment. {subscribe now}