Weblog
About ArmaVirumque ( AHR-mah wih-ROOM-kweh) In the Aeneid, the Roman poet Virgil sang of "arms and a man" (Arma virumque cano). Month in and month out, The New Criterion expounds with great clarity and wit on the art, culture, and political controversies of our times. With postings of reviews, essays, links, recs, and news, Armavirumque seeks to continue this mission in accordance with the timetable of the digital age. Recent posts
Archives more archives Info
Recent contributors
Shortcut
To contact The New Criterion by email, write to: letters@newcriterion.com.To contact The New Criterion by mail, write to: The New Criterion 900 Broadway Suite 602 New York, New York 10003 USA
Blogroll
Dec 18, 2007 03:59 PM by Stefan Beck
For a decade now, my mantra has been: “I reject Harry Potter and all his works.” In 2000, when Mr. Potter was just three years old, Harold Bloom predicted that “[t]he cultural critics will, soon enough, introduce Harry Potter into their college curriculum.” And it came to pass at Stanford University just a few months ago. (You’ll have to follow the link to see a senior at a prestigious university wearing a Potter-style lightning bolt on her forehead.)
A shame they couldn’t [sic] the whole article and pretend it never happened. I don’t want to be thought a curmudgeon—even Harold Bloom fretted briefly about his “highbrow snobbery”—but I think it’s reasonable to suggest that adults spend their reading time, a limited and thus very precious resource, on better books. If that’s wishful thinking, can’t they at least pick better books to obsess about? (Since I am undoubtedly offending countless readers of this blog, I hasten to add that this is only a suggestion. I’d expect the same treatment for my obsession with this stuff.)
Here’s one alternative, for those who don’t want to leave the YA Fantasy aisle: Philip Pullman’s “His Dark Materials” trilogy. I haven’t read the books, the first of which has just been made into a movie, as my own interest in fantasy stop at the Volsunga Saga. Still, it’s noteworthy that even the books’ harshest critics concede that they’re “real literature.”
That piece, from the Wall Street Journal, tackles the trilogy’s atheism, which sounds like a crude but at least high-profile contribution to our current (or is it eternal?) national debate about religion. In other words, it’s more worth your time than paying for the gold-leaf wallpaper in J. K. Rowling’s bathroom.
E-mail to friend
|
Subscriber login
 The New Criterion is now optimized for Mobile Devices Already a print subscriber? click for online access New from The New Criterion: ‘Free speech in 
Webcasts
The Milt Rosenberg Show: Free Speech in an age of Jihad
Roger Kimball on liberalism's response to Islam
Encounter Books at 10, an interview with Roger Simon |
add a comment
you must be a new criterion subscriber to post a comment. {subscribe now}